rfid_ear_tag_animals

By Barbara H. Peterson

Farm Wars

Move over, NAIS, here comes NHIS – a National Human Identification System under the FDA. And you thought a tracking system was just for livestock. Well, you are right. To the ruling oligarchy, we the people are just that – livestock to be herded, tracked, culled, and medicated.

Take a look at the following section of HR 3200, which can be found in entirety HERE: HR3200. My comments are bolded.

Subtitle C – Food and Drug Administration

(This section of HR 3200 specifically sets up the NHIS, or National Human Identification System under the FDA.)

PART 1 IN GENERAL

 

SEC. 2561. NATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTRY.

 

(a) REGISTRY –

 

(1) IN GENERAL – Section 519 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i) is amended –

 

(A) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and

 

(B) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:

 

“National Medical Device Registry” (g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that –

 

(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and

 

(B) is –

 

(i) a class III device; or

(Notice the word “or” in the following. This means that the device is either implantable, life-supporting, or life sustaining. It can be neither life-supporting or life sustaining, just implantable.)

(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.

 

(2) In developing the registry, the Secretary shall, in consultation with the  Commissioner of Food and Drugs, the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, determine the best methods for –

(Each device will have a unique identifier. Since the devices are implanted in humans, each human will most likely be registered with that device number.)

(A) including in the registry, in a manner consistent with subsection (f), appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier;

 

(B) validating methods for analyzing patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and for linking such data with the information included in the registry as described in subparagraph (A), including, to the extent feasible, use of –

 

(i) data provided to the Secretary under other provisions of this chapter; and

 

(ii) information from public and private sources identified under paragraph (3);

 

(C) integrating the activities described in this subsection with –

 

(i) activities under paragraph (3) of section 505(k)(relating to active postmarket risk identification);

 

(ii) activities under paragraph (4) of section 505(k)(relating to advanced analysis of drug safety data); and

 

(iii) other postmarket device surveillance activities of the Secretary authorized by this chapter; and

(Through this implantable device, surveilled activities will be monitored)

(D) providing public access to the data and analysis collected or developed through the registry in a manner and form that protects patient privacy and proprietary information and is comprehensive, useful, and not misleading to patients, physicians, and scientists.

 

(3) (A) To facilitate analyses of postmarket safety and patient outcomes for devices described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, in collaboration with public, academic, and private entities, develop methods to –

(Here is the data that will be collected – all health related information, including insurance information, pharmaceutical purchases, health insurance claims, and anything else the Secretary deems necessary, including Medicare and information from the Dept. of Veteran’s Affairs, as well as privately owned health care facilities and pharmacies.)

(i) obtain access to disparate sources of patient safety and outcomes data, including –

 

(I) Federal health-related electronic data (such as data from the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act or from the health systems of the Department of Veterans Affairs);

 

(II) private sector health-related electronic data (such as pharmaceutical purchase data and health insurance claims data); and

 

(III) other data as the Secretary deems necessary to permit postmarket assessment of device safety and effectiveness; and

 

(Links the data collected with registry information.)

 

(ii) link data obtained under clause (i) with information in the registry.

(This section sets up the registry files, and allows for the pooling and analysis of the information gleened.)

(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘data’ refers to information respecting a device described in paragraph (1), including claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.

 

(4) Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall promulgate regulations for establishment and operation of the registry under paragraph(1). Such regulations –

(Notice that this is done under the guise of protecting the public health, and the requirement to submit each device’s unique identifyer to the registry is addressed here.)

(A)(i) in the case of devices that are described in paragraph (1) and sold on or after the date of the enactment of this subsection, shall require manufacturers of such devices to submit information to the registry, including, for each such device, the type, model, and serial number or, if required under subsection (f), other unique  device identifier; and

 

(ii) in the case of devices that are described in paragraph (1) and sold before such date, may require manufacturers of such devices  to submit such information to the registry, if deemed necessary by the Secretary to protect the public health;

 

(B) shall establish procedures –

(Permits linkage of retrieved information to patients in registry.)

(i) to permit linkage of information submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) with patient safety and outcomes data obtained under paragraph (3); and

(Permits analyses of linked data.)

(ii) to permit analyses of linked data;

 

(C) may require device manufacturers to submit such other information as is necessary to facilitate postmarket assessments of device safety and effectiveness and notification of device risks;

(Items included in the registry that are pooled and analyzed include adverse event trends, patterns, and any other information the Secretary deems appropriate. Timely reports to be given to the Secretary concerning data analysis.)

(D) shall establish requirements for regular and timely reports to the Secretary, which shall be included in the registry, concerning adverse event trends, adverse event patterns, incidence and prevalence of adverse events, and other information the Secretary determines appropriate, which may include data on comparative safety and outcomes trends; and

 

(E) shall establish procedures to permit public access to the information in the registry in a manner and form that protects patient privacy and proprietary information and is comprehensive, useful, and not misleading to patients, physicians, and scientists.

(Sums to be appropriated to institute the registry. From whom? Taxpayers. We will be paying for our own NHIS system.)

(5) To carry out this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2010 and 2011.

 

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by paragraph (1), by not later than the date that is 36t months after the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether or not final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been promulgated by such date.

 

(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT – Section 303(f)(1)(B)(ii) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking “519(g)” and inserting “519(h)”.

 

ELECTRONIC EXCHANGE AND USE IN CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS OF UNIQUE DEVICE IDENTIFIERS –

 

(1) RECOMMENDATIONS – The HIT Policy Committee established under section 3002 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.300jj – 12) shall recommend to the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device described in section 519(g)(1) of the Federal Food,Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by subsection (a).

(The information retrieved by the devices will be exchanged and used in electronic health records Health Information Technology – HIT.)

(2) STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA, AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA – The Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting through the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, shall adopt standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device described in paragraph (1), if such an identifier is required by section 519(f) of the Federal Food,8 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the device.

Welcome to the future where everything we do is tracked, analyzed, and used to formulate actuarial tables for insurance companies, food suppliers, medical establishments, pharmaceutical companies, and any private corporation or government entity that the Secretary deems appropriate for public health and safety. And all under the oh so competent hands of the Food and Drug Administration. Feel like a piece of meat? I sure do. All of our movements, purchases, and health statistics, including vaccination records, tracked under the FDA just like a herd of cows.

First NAIS, then NHIS. After all, we are are just another species of animal, right? Just another warm-blooded mammal led around on a leash, herded into corrals and tamed. WRONG! It is time to stand up on our hind legs and fight this takeover by the New World Order oligarchs. It is time to just say NO!

©2009 Barbara H. Peterson

Print Friendly
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponShare on Google+Digg thisShare on LinkedInPrint this page

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

19 Responses to “HR 3200 Institutes a National Human Identification System NHIS”

  1. Frank, You are entitled to your opinion. Implantable devices SUCH AS…. this encompasses ALL implantable devices. Microchips for healthcare and other uses are already here. It is just a matter of time and directive…

  2. Frank Proske says:

    I read the actual legislation as you have cited and do not see what you see. This refers to medical devices that may be implantable, such as an artificial heart or a pacemaker, and the government requiring the manufacturers and sellers to track such devices for the sake of efficiacy of treatment. No where is there any mention of requiring the population at large to receive implantable microchips. I am against this health care law and the Obama regime, but I think this micro-chip “666” story is reading alot between the lines.

  3. ITK7 says:

    not only have globalists quantified, catalogued ALL merchandise on earth…they’ve been ruling w/human robots — Jesse Jackson accesses Palin’s memory files and much more…MUST SEE Cindy McCain give Jesse “controller” to download coded Intel from Kissinger’s latest MK-bot…Sarah Palin

    blog moderator: NOT spam and definitely NOT a joke

    http://intheknow7.wordpress.com/

    Be Well

  4. Hi Diane,

    Here is a link to the full version: http://docs.house.gov/rules/health/111_ahcaa.pdf

    I believe it is the correct one. If I am wrong, someone please correct me. I cannot find the medical device registry in it, but haven’t read the whole thing yet. I have gotten to Sect. 501, which mandates individuals get insurance or pay taxes equal to 2.5% of modified adjusted gross income, which is under the IRS.

  5. Diane Eaton says:

    PLEASE! Has anyone read the Health Care Reform bill signed by Obama? If so (2,000+ pages) can you cite the wording that creates a National Medical Device Registry????? I want to be absolutely sure it exists before I put it on my website.

    Thanks,

    Diane Eaton

  6. amazing they can bring it in in 36 months..regardless of it being finalised..
    rather irregular methinks

    (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by paragraph (1), by not later than the date that is 36t months after the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether or not final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been promulgated by such date.

    In Australia it is Illegal to remove an animal chip once implanted, Unless! you can get a vet to say it was a hazard to health. not likely unless it has caused a tumour. bit late by then!!
    ??? and just quietly?? WHERE? is the LONG Term human trials data? how many people have been chipped already?
    what issues?
    betcha there are None! done..or reported.
    oh and at some horse sales here- I see the cattle and sheep and goats sellers are Charged for every animal for sale to have the damn chip read. this is after purchase of tags and machinery to attach them, paperwork, and endless stuffing around.
    Great extra revenue source for?? everyone but the producer!

  7. Gregor says:

    If this chip is mandated in the health care bill and verichip gets its new personal idenity company together with its health care info then this could be the mark of the beast. And in reality all it would take is for the US dollar to collapse and the new world currency to be implimented for the emergency crises to be called and make this a requirement to buy sell work have health care etc etc. Wow. Just remember Jesus is coming back and the rapture takes place before or right at the signing of the seven year peace treaty and the mark doesn’t happen until the middle. So all true believers will be gone. And that means we have to get this out to the rest of the world soon.

  8. Keith says:

    This sounds just like the Mark of the Beast. Required? As if we are ‘just livestock’? Like…..a REVIVAL of nazi germany? Suppose the ‘beast’ isn’t a person, but a system, whose deadly wound has “healed” (ww2, “fall of communism”, what a farce!), and is re-enacting the same tired methods, albeit with new toys. Do not receive this chip!!!!! It will mean the destruction of your very soul!
    Jesus Christ reigns forever, the beast will “reign” only for a short time, which is allowed only by His Will, so the beast has NO POWER, only that which is doled out by His Sovereignty.
    Hold on tight to Jesus, it’s going to be a very scary ride. Are you aware of project blue beam? Google it and learn to be as wise as snakes and gentle as doves. Peace.

  9. Shirl says:

    There is evidence suggesting that the needles used in the current, global H1N1 vaccine scam
    contain a microchip. Austrian journalist Jane Burgermeister’s website has detailed information
    about this United Nations sponsored genocide. http://www.theflucase.com
    Forced vaccinations could be upon us sooner than we realize. Please spread the word!

  10. mike wright says:

    I KNOW THAT JESUS SAYS THAT THE CHURCH (ALL TRUE BELIEVERS) ARE TO BE DECERNING. I AGREE WITH THE SUBJECT BEING CONFRONTED.I FOR ONE WILL NOT TAKE A CHIP,PERIOD.IN REFUSING IT YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GET IT REMOVED! MY GOD IS AND WILL SUPPLY ALL OF MY NEEDS. LETS KEEP OUR EFFORTS ON LOST SOULS AND USING OUR SPIRITUAL GIFTS. MAY GOD RECIEVE ALL THE GLORY!!!

  11. This is all getting scary,Revalation talks quite plainly of it.
    It seems Jesus coming is real close,Don’t take the chip! Don’t be deceived! God is all soverign if you are in Christ Romans 8:28
    applies to you.
    Charlie from central N.Y.state

  12. In this endeavor, it is a comfort to know that HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius,(who had difficulty with “unintentional errors” on her taxes and admitted “low balling” contributions from Dr. Tiller of late term abortions per Michelle Malkin in “Culture of Corruption”)will be assisted by Health Czar Nancy DeParle. Ms. DeParle has sat on corporate boards with health & medical care interests.According to Malkin, Ms. DeParle has “earned at least $376,000 from Cerner Corp., for example, which specializes in health information technology.” “In 2006 & 2007 alond, DeParle collected at least $3.5 million from fees and the sales and awards of stock from health care businesses…..”, per Malken. No conflict of interest there, I guess.

  13. […] will combine money, identity, and health records in one convenient package. Then read the article HR 3200 Institutes a National Human Identification System – NHIS. Verichip makes the chip, the FDA creates the registry, and Congress mandates health insurance, […]

  14. SuMa says:

    Thanks you for this information. I passed it to all on my e-mail
    list. Knowledge is empowering.

    Jesus is King!!!

  15. sam says:

    I have actually talked to several vets about this horror and
    several of them say they will remove chips from people for the
    asking. I think a person could remove it themselves. They’re
    not in a vein just under the skin. It’s worth loosing a little
    blood for to get the thing out of ya.

  16. David McElroy says:

    Hey! Don’t take the chip! We are not livestock. Remember the government always encroaches by increments and sells us a bill of goods hyping the “convenience and services”…but delivers something horrible. And once the chips are implanted widely, and resistors isolated in “camps”…look to see those also used to contain further data, like your finances and court records, social and political rankings, etc. Folks, this is just the “camel’s nose under the tent” to slip us the “Mark of the Beast” the Bible warns of in the Revelation of John. We must resist to the death or live like cattle led to the slaughter to put milk, meat, and leather in rich men’s homes!! Just say NO!!

  17. ned lud says:

    Hi there, you two (Barbara and Marti).

    I like the fact that you post how many ‘visits’ this material receives (at Farm Wars).

    I think, slowly, people are catching on to what is happening, but we are very very late in the race.

    It is very difficult for me personally, because I ‘saw’ and started the fight (to resist corporate dominance) early on and for a time in my young life, I actually thought things were going to get better. They have only gotten worse. In the time I have seen things grow worse, I have of course, been swindled and abused by those organization I thought were friendly. In my defense, I really had no choice but to believe them.

    I am very tired, now. And very hurt.

    nedlud

  18. Good point, Marty. This could be another type of “color of law” enforcement situation. The bill mandates healthcare, but if you cannot get treated if you don’t get the chip, then you just pay for it without using it, or if you don’t pay, then you are in violation and subject to fines for not complying with the healthcare mandate. This is the same type of “color of law” tactic used with the swine flu vaccines. The shot is not mandatory, but if you want your children to go to public school, they must have the shot. If you want to keep your job, you must get the shot.

  19. Marti Oakley says:

    I reported this very thing when I was on the Derry Brownfield show on GCN September 16th. Several people wrote and called me and said I was crazy, a conspiracy nut and just hated Obama.

    In the first “reform” bill, it was hidden in pages 1001-05. Trackign back through all the changes to statutes & codes I began seeing the names of companies and corporations all considered “vested interests”. All of them were chip manufacturers such as Angel, Verichip, etc. Then came the “private investors”. I tracked more than 63 “vested interests” before finally giving up the chase.

    It all gets down to this……if the states won’t accept REAL ID voluntarily they will issue it thru this back door provision….no chip NO HEALTHCARE. PERIOD.

    Marti Oakley