monsanto liedJon Rappoport

No More Fake News

The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) is one the most prestigious mainstream groups in America. Quoting from its website:

“NAS is a private, non-profit society of distinguished scholars. Established by an Act of Congress, signed by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863, the NAS is charged with providing independent, objective advice to the nation on matters related to science and technology. Scientists are elected by their peers to membership in the NAS for outstanding contributions to research. The NAS is committed to furthering science in America, and its members are active contributors to the international scientific community. Nearly 500 members of the NAS have won Nobel Prizes, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, founded in 1914, is today one of the premier international journals publishing the results of original research.”

You’d think the major media would dutifully parrot every NAS pronouncement. And with few exceptions, you’d be right.

Here is an exception. In May, the NAS issued a comprehensive report: “Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects.”The report’s key finding takes in the entire period of US cultivation of GMO crops:

“The nation-wide data on maize, cotton, or soybean in the United States do not show a significant signature of genetic-technology on the rate of yield increase.”Chapter 6, Page 66.

A less ponderous translation: the genetic engineering of crops hasn’t resulted in rising output.


Bigger yield was the whole selling point of GMOs.

That was the innovation that was going to save the world.

That was, and is, what the grotesque hype-artist, Bill Gates, has been trying to sell Africa.

Incompetent scientists, sold-out scientists, brain-damaged scientists, scared scientists have all been assuring us that GMO crops produce much higher yields, and they’ve been accusing critics of standing in the way of progress for all, hatred of humanity, and ignorance of real science.

Suddenly, their darling of darlings, the National Academy of Sciences, is pelting them with pigeon droppings from above.

The horror.

Not higher crops yields? What? All that gene manipulation? All that health-destroying Roundup? And what is there to show for it?

Let’s see. Oh yes. Larger corporate profits.

A great deal of stage magic, a host of technical incantations, a heavy dose of shuck and jive, and poof, more money for Monsanto and Dow and the other mystical babbling biotech giants.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “The GMO Big Lie dies on the vine”

  1. susan says:

    Kissinger: “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.”

  2. Abe says:

    “shuck and jive” Haven’t heard that expression in a coons age!

  3. George H says:

    It’s as obvious as Black and White, or as plain as Good and Evil. Organic foods promote health, gmos destroy health. Dr. Serralini’s tumorous lab rats indisputably proves that. So what’s it going to be, God’s abundant cornucopia, or Satan’s poisoned larder. GMO crops are not the panacea to world hunger, au contraire, they’re the promoters of starvation, disease, and death i.e. part of the Great Culling process. So I think I’ll continue to eat organic, as we all should, then maybe after awhile, we should EAT THE RICH.

  4. Art Massucco says:

    I have no proof of this but I think this was a plot involving the government to dominate the world’s food supply. All new technology is weaponized in the US, food included. Now we have a new Cold War 2 where the US, Russia, China, etc are developing new weapons capable of massive destruction globally.

  5. ozspeaksup says:

    13 fungicides, 9herbicides 4 insecticides
    pity they fail to list WHAT ones BY NAME

  6. ozspeaksup says:

    Hi Barbara, yes Rappaports right, as you also have been for decades:-)
    all we got was superbugs n superweeds and dead soils and sick people and animals
    but heck..
    WE and the animals dont matter…PROFIT is the thing!
    and if Gates(of Hell ) buys into has to be bad for everyone else..its how he rolls