Paid by Monsanto

Barbara H. Peterson

Farm Wars

I want food that Grandma ate. How hard is that to understand? I don’t want it chemically lobotomized and coated with poison. I don’t want it genetically spliced to become something between a salamander and a tomato. I don’t want it radiated and mutated. I don’t want a virus inserted in its DNA. I don’t want its RNA tampered with to change its traits. I just want good, old fashioned food. The kind you grow in your garden and use to feed your family and critters. The kind the bees like to collect pollen from and not go belly up the minute they enter the hive. The kind that you can pick with your bare hands and eat right from the plant. The kind that won’t turn your stomach into a pesticide factory and your guts into mush.

I actually have the gall to want food that is edible and good for me, not just something a chemical company threw together sporting a pretty label and packaging that says it is. Is that really too much to ask?

Well, according to Monsanto et al, it is. And the agribusiness giants have taken over the universities.

These corporate GMO and chemical farming pushers are brainwashing whole generations of young adults and senior adults that GMOs are safe, have been around for thousands of years, and are a perfectly natural alternative to Grandma’s garden, made by Monsanto. The chemical/life sciences company. You know the one. The one that appears to poison the very ground that it sits on along with the people around it.

Just how were Nitro citizens exposed to dioxin? Monsanto was producing the toxic herbicide Agent Orange in Nitro, and dioxin is a chemical byproduct of the substance. It is known to cause serious health conditions. The factory which produced Agent Orange was opened in Nitro in 1948 and remained in operation until 2004, even though usage of this herbicide in the past (in Vietnam and other Asian countries) was fatal to millions of citizens and the war veterans who were exposed to it.

http://naturalsociety.com/monsanto-ordered-pay-93-million-small-town-poisoned-herbicide/#ixzz38ZTuFLvq

Is this what we want for our children? Our planet? Our dinner plates?

Monsanto laughed all the way to the bank while covering up the toxicity of its industrial shenanigans as Anniston, Alabama’s children played in and ate dirt soaked with PCBs at yet another toxic superfund site created by Monsanto.

On the west side of Anniston, the poor side of Anniston, the people ate dirt. They called it “Alabama clay” and cooked it for extra flavor. They also grew berries in their gardens, raised hogs in their back yards, caught bass in the murky streams where their children swam and played and were baptized. They didn’t know their dirt and yards and bass and kids — along with the acrid air they breathed — were all contaminated with chemicals. They didn’t know they lived in one of the most polluted patches of America.

http://farmwars.info/?p=664

That is what Monsanto is about. Greed and avarice. Not feeding a starving world as the PR would have you believe.

And this is the company my friends, that is hell bent on owning the foundation of the world’s food supply, including that snack you are munching on, organic or not. And we are supposed to trust its good intentions? I’ll just bet those kids who played on that toxic soil in Anniston are feeling the love about now, as they inhale their last breaths through a respirator in the cancer wing of the local hospital.

Want to know why supposed “scientists” from universities such as UC Davis can get by with purporting to be “not receiving funds” from the biotech industry while spouting Monsanto propaganda? Because the money they receive is laundered through the universities they work for. They don’t receive it directly from Monsanto, they simply receive their paycheck from the university that does. Or the foundation that does. Or whatever biotech sinkhole that will accept money for services rendered.

universitieshttp://documents.foodandwaterwatch.org/doc/PublicResearchPrivateGain.pdf

Land grant universities’ dependence on industry money has corrupted the independence of public science, as academics align their research projects with the ambitions of the private sector. Industry funding also diverts academic resources and attention away from projects that benefit the public, including research that challenges corporate control of food systems.

Donors can and do influence the outcomes of research to meet their business needs. More than 15 percent of university scientists acknowledge having “changed the design, methodology or results of a study in response to pressure from a funding source.”

Individual examples of pro-industry research abound… [A] study found that around half of authors of peer-reviewed journal articles about the safety of genetically engineered (GE) foods had an identifiable affiliation with industry. All of these produced favorable results to industry sponsors, while very few acknowledged having received industry funding.

http://documents.foodandwaterwatch.org/doc/PublicResearchPrivateGain.pdf

The future of a major research deal between UC Davis and the Monsanto corporation brings the role of the university into bold relief. How far can a university go in collaborating with private industry before its mission of contributing to basic knowledge becomes distorted? How will we know when it’s gone too far?

http://nature.berkeley.edu/srr/Alliance/novartis/davis.htm

Here is a link to a letter confirming only one of Monsanto’s many contributions to UC Davis:

http://www.cheeseslave.com/wp-cont…/…/2012/10/grfx_c3_31.pdf

The following is a portion of a Sacramento Bee article that has been removed from the newspaper’s site:

A “who’s who” of international biotechnology companies fund work at UC Davis. They include Monsanto, Syngenta, DuPont and Bayer. Some grants pay for specific research, but many arrive with no official strings attached. Whatever the form, the companies get something in return – access to the university’s talent pool and, often, first crack at its scientific breakthroughs.

The public is having a hard time figuring out where the corporate door ends and where the university door begins,” said Bill Liebhardt, former director of the UC system’s sustainable farming program, which promotes nonindustrial farming methods.

Small farmers — the very people agricultural colleges like UC Davis were established to help — feel neglected. “The university is being led by industry,” said Judith Redmond, co-owner of Full Belly Farm, an organic vegetable farm in Yolo County. (Source: Sacramento Bee)

But don’t worry, Monsanto and its cohorts are feeding the world. What’s left of it when they get through is anyone’s guess.

This type of behavior is unacceptable by any standards. The Universities are essentially bought off by corporate biotech interests such as Monsanto’s and tasked with unleashing a technology with relatively unknown consequences on the general public under the guise of a love for humanity; a PR campaign designed to sell as much of the stuff as possible. This type of behavior is not only unethical, but criminal. Yet, that is exactly what Monsanto has a sordid history of doing and getting away with. With the government’s blessing and complicity. Money talks, reason walks. Along with common sense, compassion, and any spark of humanity left in the souls of those wretched creatures who are pulling the trigger on humanity one gene-spliced concoction at a time.

@2015 Barbara H. Peterson

Print Friendly
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponShare on Google+Digg thisShare on LinkedInPrint this page

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

7 Responses to “Paid by Monsanto”

  1. Marla says:

    For those of us who understand what has happened, what is happening now, and have a vision of what is to come …. TALK … TALK TO EVERYONE….open dialogue. Have a referenced resource for them to research and do something, too. Have hope in their intelligence, that the SEED YOU PLANTED will be sprouted and harvested – – then they will TALK. That is how it starts I have marched against Monsanto in Chicago, sent numerous letters to my representatives, and have utilized my FB page to plant a seed to my friends and family. Maybe some discomfort will begin to propel them into TALKING… My husband worked to clean up the travesty of the superfund site in Arkansas, agent orange, and know the political issues with remediation. It is appalling that in some places there are no choices to have organic food – – – MAKE THAT CHANGE and if they do not hear your talking…. YELL!! It is for the good of all and you.

  2. Audrey says:

    Awesomely put, you guys. I am saving what you wrote, because I’ll be damned if that “Science-deniers” rhetoric doesn’t come up. That is truly one of the best arguments I’ve read for this. Thank you again!

  3. Tom says:

    The corruption of science is a huge problem used to legitimize profit-seeking, especially in the most harmful industries (chemical, pharmaceutical, fossil fuels, fracking, biotech, etc) and has also been the case historically (leaded gasoline, asbestos, PCBs, etc).

    This drum needs to be pounded loudly and often, because right now people who are anti-GMO/toxic chemical/big pharma are getting lumped with “deniers” (of global warming, for instance). If you question GMOs, you are “anti-science.” Of course this is the corporate corruption machine at work, trying to de-legitimize their enemies.

    We have to fight back and raise awareness that a lot of what passes for “science” is really corrupt corporate spin, and in most cases there IS no science being done in the public interest (climate change is actually a pretty amazing exception given the money of the fossil fuel industry). Until we have publicly funded science that isn’t corrupted by corporate money and interests (and that includes the USDA, FDA, and EPA which usually don’t serve the public interest) we will have big problems…

  4. Audrey says:

    This list could be the basis for some great research software–maybe an app too- that could essentially ping/highlight these universities and organizations for you when you’re reading journals or articles. Maybe also rank them in terms of degree of ‘entrenchement’ with GMO biotech companies, to help you weigh their findings better. All the info on that very list is great ranking criteria and useful info for weighing their credibility. It would be great to design some software that could do this. Maybe it could be like a function attached to a web browser that you could turn on and off like private browsing?

    I read a lot of scientific journals and it is so tiring and discouraging (not to mention a lot of work) sifting through stuff that’s coming from tainted sources. I just read yesterday how the FDA has been covering up fraudulent scientific studies, (Charles Seife has page with his investigations on this) and I tell you, we need to get smarter about this. Tainted science is cropping up everywhere and we *need* keep on top of our sources!

  5. suss says:

    Yeah i agree not waking up the peeps fast enough….. It’ll be too late by the time enough do wake up. I just moved from washington state to florida and it amazes me how organics are really hard to come by here can’t find any organic leavened bread here, nada not even the whole foods in naples, they have poisoned bread only and the vegi section is really bad as well tons of conventional, washington state was great for organic. Also the raw milk here is illegal but can buy it for pets, ha ha ha, so we all buy it for our dogs, he he!!!! Older people are many here and they are rediculously brain washed they have no idea about anything real…… NO IDEA and they don’t care!!!!!

  6. Thank you for this entry!

  7. terry adams says:

    THANK YOU for your tireless research into the poisoning of humanity… People ARE waking up, just not fast enough for my taste… we are in trouble!

    again.. thank you for putting yourself on the front lines in this fight to save humanity.. you are one of my heroes-

    Terry