Barbara H. Peterson

Farm Wars

Agenda 21 is alive and well in Klamath County, Oregon. Klamath Basin farmers are feeling the wrath of the Klamath Tribes in collusion with the Federal and Oregon state governments. Water is now basically off limits to ranchers unless they get approval from the tribes, and approvals are few and far between.

Let’s take a little trip in the Wayback Machine to 2001…

In April of 2001, the greatest water theft in history took place in the Klamath Falls Basin. This theft was conducted by the Federal government on the pretense of saving the “endangered” sucker fish for the Klamath Tribes. After speaking to a member of a tribe who was not in agreement with this theft, I found that the sucker fish is not one that the tribe normally eats, but instead, is used as bait because it is unpalatable. The sucker fish also requires low water levels, not more water as the Federal government states. This “endangered” sucker fish was also considered a pest in the 1960s:

In the case of the sucker, the government itself holds the smoking gun. After a poisoning campaign in the 1960s, it’s a wonder there are any suckers left. At that time, the state of Oregon embarked on an eradication campaign to poison several lakes to rid them of the sucker, then considered a pest. Even poisoning could not eliminate the sucker, yet the government now claims the difference of a few feet in lake elevation could spell doom for the sucker.

What happened in 2001 resulted in family farms going dry, and people going bankrupt and losing their homes. Dry fields could be seen for miles while driving down the road. The farmers that survived the crisis got water, but the dispute is still going on. It is not over by a long shot. The Klamath Tribes council is calling for almost all of the Klamath Basin water to be under their direction even though there is no tribal reservation, and the Federal government is backing the plan.

Maxine Kizer and her neighbors have been minding their own business tending their farms and ranches for generations. Now the Federal government and the local Indian Tribes have decided they need all the water because they intend to “reserve” the water for hunting and fishing rights for the now non existent Indian reservation, which was created 140 years ago. Never mind the fact that both the Indian Tribe and the Federal government actually aggressively promoted the development of irrigated agriculture in this 140 year interim. Armed with millions of our tax dollars they have now set out to destroy Maxine and her neighbor’s life. But it is not just Maxine’s American dream at stake, if they are successful here, Indian Tribes across the country will be able to demand all the water, even threatening municipal supplies for our cities.

The success of this plan spells disaster for not only the Klamath Basin family farmers, but for all family farmers, as it will be a precedent. Without locally grown produce and animal feed, we will be even more dependent on imported food at a much higher price. This will also open the door for multinational corporations to infiltrate our agricultural community with more GMO products – drought resistant, no doubt.

Fast forward, and it’s now 2014…

FORT KLAMATH, Ore. ­— Many ranchers in Oregon’s Upper Klamath Basin appear to grudgingly accept a water-sharing settlement between irrigators and the Klamath Tribes that was finalized earlier this month.

Rancher Roger Nicholson, a harsh critic of water calls by the tribes and federal government that led to a shutoff of Upper Basin irrigation pumps last summer, says the deal is the best that ranchers could hope for and predicts it will be agreed to by a vast majority of affected landowners.

“This at least allows some usage, and in some years quite a bit of usage probably,” said Nicholson, who was involved in the talks. “The only other alternative is years more of litigation.”

The talks came after a court last year granted the tribes senior water rights in the Sycan, Wood and Williamson river watersheds draining into Upper Klamath Lake, where the tribes say a decline in sucker fish populations has threatened their livelihoods and traditions.

The pact that the parties have been ironing out since late December includes various restoration projects, stipulated in-stream flows and the permanent retirement of 30,000 acre-feet of water for restoring fisheries. Nicholson said landowners won a key concession in that they’ll be compensated for land they can’t use as a result of the deal.

If approved by ranchers and tribal members, the pact will be included in legislation by U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., to authorize and fund the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement and a companion measure to remove four dams from the Klamath River.

To be certain, opposition to the Upper Basin agreement persists. Jerry Jones, who operates a small ranch south of Chiloquin, Ore., believes the agreement could spark new legal battles.

“It does away with our private property rights,” he said.

Bruce Topham, a rancher in the Sprague River Valley, said he’s unsure whether he’ll sign the agreement. He objects to the amount of land that ranchers would have to put in easements – 130 feet on each side of a river or stream, he said.

“We basically aren’t allowed to use it,” Topham said. “In our case, it’s a lot of acres … You’re controlled on what you can do on your own land.”

But rancher Becky Hyde, a vocal KBRA supporter who was involved in the Upper Basin negotiations, said most landowners realize that “everyone needs to bring their log to the fire so we can make this thing work,” and that more participation means more water.

“We know what the alternative to settlement looked like because we lived through it last year,” Hyde said. “I think we have more momentum toward a settlement than we’ve ever had.

“The thing about it is it also deals with our endangered species issues to the best of their ability under the law,” she said. “Frankly some of us are pretty interested in that part of it for protection. We’ll see how it goes. I think right now it’s just an important time for folks to understand what it means for them.”

Nicholson believes this is the landowners’ last chance to achieve a settlement over water.

“I’ve been involved in several other attempts to settle it, and this probably is the last one,” he said. “If this isn’t settled now, it will go into litigation for a long, long time.”

The grinding down of our farmers has taken 14 long years, but now the Agenda 21 plan is about to bear fruit, and Klamath Basin is the prize. Surviving ranchers are being threatened with a complete water shutoff.

The State recently told us that they are going to shut off all of the surface water above Klamath Lake again this year. Considering how dry it has been this winter that is understandable. What most people do not know is that Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) has decided that it will also shut off most of the wells above Klamath Lake.

In other words, sign and get a little bit of water, or don’t sign and we will keep you in litigation and shut off your water until you dry up and go away. Strongarm tactics, pure and simple.

But just what else do the tribes get out of all this, besides complete control over nearly all water?

A $40 million economic development package for the Tribes to fund a timber mill and other related activities so they can harvest timber on the 92,000-acre Mazama Forest and grow its economic base. The Tribes also would receive $1 million a year for five years from the Department of Interior to address tribal transition needs beginning this year.

Looks like a pretty hefty bribe to me. But wait, there’s more…

Stated goal of the Klamath Tribes according to a Klamath Tribal Economic Revitalization document:

Klamath Tribes Economic Revitalitation

Without water, this land will sell for pennies on the dollar, and residents of the basin can expect a proverbial knock on the door and ‘offer to buy’ for a criminally low price.

But that’s not the end of it. When the ranching industry in this area is destroyed for the sake of a few million bucks, the feds will do to the tribes exactly what they have done to the Indian nations for years… destroy them too… again. Welcome to an Agenda 21 in your face takeover, courtesy of your corrupt tribal, state and federal governments acting as agents of the United Nations Agenda 21 population control program.

©2014 Barbara H. Peterson

Print Friendly
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponShare on Google+Digg thisShare on LinkedInPrint this page

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

12 Responses to “Agenda 21 Takeover in Klamath Basin”

  1. Tina says:

    To Riversong:

    I hope you’re just a troll. Agenda 21’s ultimate goal is to completely eviscerate ALL PROPERTY RIGHTS; drive EVERYONE off the land (including the suburbs) and into small apartments in packed cities, where you have NO RIGHTS AT ALL.

    Look it up, see DemocratsAgainstAgenda21.

    It is right there for all to see. Our controlled press will not touch it.

    Grow the hell up, will you?

  2. Interesting point of view, and fully in line with the United Nation’s Agenda 21. Do you fish? Fish are innocent creatures too. To go along with your thinking, it is time we cut fishermen off from all water, including… everyone, not just a special interest group. The ranching families around here are some of the most ecologically minded people I have met. They support wildlife grazing in the fields after harvest, maintain the waterways because they are crucial for all life, keep us supplied with hay and forage for our animals, and allow cattle to roam free range for most of the year instead of being confined to CAFOs. It is not the ranching families in this area that have destroyed anything. It is the U.N. along with corrupt government officials and those who are brainwashed into thinking destruction of all farmland is a good thing that are working on destroying everything, not those who are attempting to put food on the table in an ecologically sound manner.

  3. Tina says:

    I wonder how much money the UN had to pay those Indians to start screaming they wanted it back.

    The Indians in Flathead Valley Montana are all of a sudden interested in getting ‘their’ land back too.

    Did you get the info on contacting the blog on this I sent you?

  4. Riversong says:

    Ranchers have destroyed and devastated public and private lands for over two hundred years. It is about time we cut them off from all water and alow their businesses to dissapear forever. slaughtering innocent creatures like cows and buffalo is a practice that needs to be ended forever. Whatever angle and whatever the cost. These ranching families have destroyed our wildlands.

  5. theBuckWheat says:

    And the money to fund this outrage will come from the federal government’s self-assumed power to create near-infinite debt out of thin air, with which we get near-infinite government.

    The answer to many of these outrages is the same: when we call a convention to consider amendments to the Constitution, the first one must be to severely curtail the ability of the federal government to fund its ongoing, non-emergency, operations via the creation of money (debt, fiat, loan guarantee or any other method).

    Near-infinite money enables near-infinite government.

  6. We are smack dab in the middle of former reservation land. The tribes sold this land years ago, now they want it back.

  7. Tina says:


    Thank you for that info. I am intensely interested in Ag21, as anybody should be.

    Barb, are you and most of these ranchers on INDIAN LAND?

    The ranchers in Montana are, and that’s when certain payments to the Indians made them go rogue.

  8. It’s the leadership. This area is economically depressed, which equates to easy pickings. The weather does not allow a lot of crops other than hay, and that is our primary economic base. That and cattle. California moves cattle here for grazing, then back again to California during winter. Most of these cattle don’t even eat much hay, they graze between states, and that is healthy for the cows and equates to good management practices. Without water, this will not be possible and a lot of these free range cattle will be consigned to CAFO feedlots. The tribes run the Casino. I don’t step foot in there because I don’t gamble and don’t promote it. The ranchers around here take good care of the land and most are very respectful of the environment. In fact, GMOs are rarely used, if at all. This whole thing is a lie from beginning to end, and no one here will benefit in the long run. Our economy, such as it is, is slated for incremental extermination. This will not only affect the ranchers, but tribal members also when federal funds run out, and they will. The fact that meetings were held behind closed doors between certain ranchers, the tribes and the feds, and that these people made the decision for everyone, is despicable. This decision also includes removal of four dams on the Klamath River, which include those in California. Pacific Power customers have been paying for the removal in each and every bill since 2009. The dams are owned by Warren Buffett. A select group of people, IMO, have no business deciding for the rest of us regarding dam removal, yet that is exactly what has happened. Did you know that in Oregon hydroelectric energy provided by these dams does not qualify as renewable energy? A setup from the get go.

  9. Tina says:

    If the Indians sell anything at all, BOYCOTT EVERYTHING THEY MAKE AND DO.

    What price your LAND?

  10. common law private attorney general Chris says:

    If the Proud 1st. nation Tribal Leaders; were open to adopting the Town’s Members, their could be Great benefits from being on:
    Tribal Land: “withOUT” The Private Foreign Incorporate Foreign owned: CorpoRATe States of and Corp U.S.; placing said lands under: “special absolute exclusive [rogue feral termed] “Federal” protected jurisdiction” capacity under protection by:
    “The Power of Congress at the Hand and Seal of the P.O.T.U.S.”?
    This is pursuant to: Treaty Law and Congressional Acts of The Congress of the Union of states united under the Compact termed the Constitution. See: Article III and IV of the de jure Constitution circa 1789 Amended 1791.

  11. Gregory Fegel says:

    Sounds like the Wall Street Indians are on the warpath, assisted by Uncle Sam. Follow the money – who profits most from this operation? It’s a modern-day range war – ain’t Capitalism great? Well, it is – for those who possess enough capital to ensure that they come out on top. A few are winners and the majority are losers – that’s how our economic system is designed to work.

  12. Tina says:

    When they go to destroy the Indians, show everybody the records you kept, as to who did what to who.

    Educate the younger generation NOW, so they can fight when the time comes.

    God speed, Barbra